A foyer card from the movie ‘The Wizard Of Oz,’ reveals a movie nonetheless of a scene during which American actress Judy Garland (1922 – 1969) (as Dorothy) wipes tears from the eyes of actor Bert Lahr (1895 – 1967) (because the Cowardly Lion), whereas watched by Jack Haley (1898 – 1979) (because the Tin Man) (left), and Ray Bolger (1904 – 1987) (because the Scarecrow), 1939. The movie was directed by Victor Fleming.
Hulton Archive | Moviepix | Getty Images
The deliberate public sale of a long-lost gown worn by Judy Garland in “The Wizard of Oz” is in jeopardy after a federal decide on Monday ordered a listening to on why he mustn’t block the sale pending the end result of a lawsuit over its possession.
The listening to in U.S. District Court in Manhattan was set for May 23, a day earlier than Bonham’s public sale home is at present scheduled to public sale the gown on behalf of The Catholic University of America.
Judge Paul Gardephe’s order scheduling the courtroom session got here after a lawyer for Wisconsin resident Barbara Hartke requested him to cease the gown’s sale till the lawsuit could possibly be determined.
Hartke, 81, claims in her go well with that the gown is the authorized property of the property of her late uncle, the Rev. Gilbert Hartke, who based Catholic University’s drama college.
Barbara Hartke, as an inheritor, could possibly be one of many folks to inherit the gown if she wins the lawsuit.
A blue and white checked gingham gown, worn by Judy Garland within the “Wizard of Oz,” hangs on show, Monday, April 25, 2022, at Bonhams in New York.
Katie Vasquez | AP
But the Washington, D.C., college has mentioned it’s the “rightful owner” of the gown that was given to Hartke in 1973 by Academy Award-winning actress Mercedes McCambridge.
The college mentioned that Gilbert Harkte’s vow of poverty as a Roman Catholic priest barred him from accepting items as his private property.
“Fr. Hartke’s estate does not have a property interest in it,” the varsity mentioned in a May 6 assertion.
The blue-and-white gingham gown is certainly one of simply two of what are believed to have been six attire made for Garland to carrying the traditional “Oz” movie. Bonham’s has estimated the gown may promote for wherever between $800,000 and $1.2 million.
The different gown was auctioned in 2015 by Bonham’s for greater than $1.5 million.
Gilbert Hartke’s possession of the gown was well-known at Catholic University after McCambridge gave it to him in appreciation for his help to her as she battled alcoholism.
But the gown was lacking for many years till it was discovered final June in a trash bag above the school mail slots throughout a renovation of the varsity’s Hartke Theater.
Amin Al-Sarraf, a lawyer for Catholic University, in a press release to CNBC, mentioned he and different legal professionals for the varsity later this week will submit authorized briefs defending the public sale.
Al-Sarraf famous that the non permanent restraining order issued Monday by Gardephe barring the public sale for “is only effective until the hearing, so it does not prevent the auction from going forward unless the Court grants the injunction request on the 23rd..
“We stay up for the chance to current the overwhelming proof supporting Catholic University’s possession of the gown to the Court subsequent week,” he mentioned.
Barbara Hartke’s lawyer and Bonham’s didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.