Home Energy Europe admits it'll must burn extra coal because it tries to wean itself off Russian power

Europe admits it'll must burn extra coal because it tries to wean itself off Russian power

Europe admits it'll must burn extra coal because it tries to wean itself off Russian power

A wind turbine and coal in Lower Saxony, Germany. The EU’s need to wean itself off Russian hydrocarbons means it might want to discover fossil fuels from different elements of the world to plug provide gaps.

Mia Bucher | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

The European Commission has fleshed out particulars of a plan to ramp up the EU’s renewable power capability and cut back its reliance on Russian fossil fuels, on the similar time acknowledging that present coal amenities might have for use for “longer than initially expected.”

A doc outlining the Commission’s goals for the REPowerEU plan was revealed on Wednesday, highlighting the significance of power financial savings, the diversification of power imports and rushing up what it known as “Europe’s clean energy transition.”

In whole, it envisages additional funding of 210 billion euros ($220.87 billion) between 2022 and 2027. When it involves renewables’ share within the EU’s power combine, the Commission has proposed that the present goal of 40% by 2030 needs to be elevated to 45%.

The Commission’s proposals got here on the identical day the governments of Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium mentioned they might intention for a mixed goal of a minimum of 65 gigawatts of offshore wind capability by 2030. By the center of the century, they’re aiming for 150 GW of capability.

Read extra about power from CNBC Pro

On the fossil gasoline entrance, the scenario is a difficult one. Russia was the largest provider of each petroleum oils and pure fuel to the EU final 12 months, in line with Eurostat.

The EU’s need to wean itself off Russian hydrocarbons following the latter’s invasion of Ukraine means it might want to discover oil and fuel from different elements of the world to plug provide gaps.

The Commission mentioned as a lot as 1.5 to 2 billion euros of funding could be wanted to safe oil provide. To import sufficient liquefied pure fuel and pipeline fuel from different sources, an estimated 10 billion euros shall be wanted by 2030.

All the above comes at a time when the EU has mentioned it needs to be carbon impartial by 2050. In the medium time period, it needs web greenhouse fuel emissions to be reduce by a minimum of 55% by 2030, which the EU calls its “Fit for 55” plan.

The Commission mentioned REPowerEU couldn’t work with out what it known as “a fast implementation of all Fit for 55 proposals and higher targets for renewables and energy efficiency.”

In this new actuality, fuel consumption within the EU would “reduce at a faster pace, limiting the role of gas as a transitional fuel,” the Commission mentioned.

“However, shifting away from Russian fossil fuels will also require targeted investments for security of supply in gas infrastructure and very limited changes to oil infrastructure alongside large-scale investments in the electricity grid and an EU-wide hydrogen backbone,” it added.

“In parallel, some of the existing coal capacities might also be used longer than initially expected, with a role for nuclear power and domestic gas resources too,” the Commission mentioned.

During a press convention on Wednesday the EU’s local weather chief, Frans Timmermans, admitted that utilizing much less pure fuel in a transitional part would imply “you might use coal a bit longer — that has a negative impact on your emissions.”

“But if at the same time, as we propose, you rapidly speed up the introduction of renewables — solar, wind, biomethane — you then have the opposite movement,” he mentioned.

Timmermans, who’s the European Commission’s government vp for the European Green Deal, went on to emphasize the significance of discovering a center floor.

“If we can actually do what I say — reduce our energy consumption in combination with a speedier introduction of renewables — we will bring down our emissions even quicker than before,” he mentioned.

“And then, of course we will have slightly higher emissions if people stick a bit longer to coal, but we need to strike the balance so that, on balance, we do not increase our emissions — we hopefully even decrease them more.”

Coal has a considerable impact on the setting, with Greenpeace describing it as “the dirtiest, most polluting way of producing energy.”

Elsewhere, the U.S. Energy Information Administration lists a variety of emissions from coal combustion, together with carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, particulates and nitrogen oxides.

The European Commission announcement drew criticism from a lot of environmental organizations.

“These plans are supposed to fast-track the clean energy transition — but the European Commission’s latest strategy gives with one hand and takes with the other,” Eilidh Robb, an anti-fossil fuels campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, mentioned.

“So-called REPowerEU contains useful and necessary strides towards renewable solutions but it simultaneously enables almost 50 fossil fuel infrastructure projects and expansions,” Robb mentioned.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here