A journalist studies close to a crowd of abortion-rights activists in entrance of the U.S. Supreme Court after the Court introduced a ruling within the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization case on June 24, 2022 in Washington, DC.
Nathan Howard | Getty Images
The Supreme Court’s determination to overturn Roe v. Wade final month raised issues that knowledge collected by tech corporations and clinics could possibly be used to criminally cost individuals who search abortions or expertise being pregnant loss.
Although the federal legislation referred to as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, protects affected person privateness, health-care suppliers can nonetheless be compelled to reveal affected person knowledge beneath particular circumstances, akin to a subpoena or a courtroom order.
There’s additionally loads of knowledge that buyers generate of their on a regular basis lives that may not be thought-about topic to HIPAA and could possibly be used as proof in courtroom towards individuals who allegedly sought abortions that violate state legal guidelines or towards their suppliers. Legal consultants observe that search historical past, textual content messages, location knowledge, and period-tracker apps may all doubtlessly be utilized in courtroom and in some circumstances have already got been.
While some expertise corporations, akin to Google and the menstrual-cycle monitoring app Flo, have introduced steps to raised defend their customers’ reproductive health-related knowledge, the safety of shoppers’ knowledge largely stays on the whims of the providers they use within the absence of federal digital privateness legislation.
Still, some states, together with California and Illinois, have already got digital privateness legal guidelines that may assist safe client knowledge extra usually. Additional state-level proposals purpose to guard reproductive well being knowledge particularly, akin to Connecticut’s Reproductive Freedom Defense Act. That invoice may assist fill in some gaps in HIPAA whereas legislators in Congress proceed to push for nationwide privateness protections.
Here is an summary of some present legal guidelines and proposals that might defend the knowledge of pregnant individuals each on and off the web.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
What it does: HIPAA is a federal affected person privateness legislation handed in 1996 that prohibits health-care suppliers and insurers from disclosing affected person data. It is overseen by the Office for Civil Rights throughout the Department of Health and Human Services.
Generally, HIPAA doesn’t enable abortion clinics or health-care suppliers to divulge to legislation enforcement officers whether or not an individual has had an abortion. If the state legislation prohibits abortion however doesn’t “expressly require” individuals to report it, an abortion clinic that studies affected person data to others can be in violation of HIPAA.
What data is not protected beneath HIPAA: HIPAA can’t resolve all privateness issues associated to reproductive rights. According to latest steering revealed by HHS, the legislation permits an abortion clinic to reveal who obtained an abortion in response to a courtroom order or summons, which may change into much more frequent within the post-Roe period.
HIPAA solely applies to sure kinds of companies and professionals. It can regulate solely well being insurers, health-care suppliers, knowledge clearinghouses and enterprise associates.
HIPAA cannot defend some affected person data gathered by anti-abortion organizations, akin to so-called disaster being pregnant facilities, that try to draw and redirect abortion-seekers. There are about 2,500 facilities throughout the nation, in keeping with Crisis Pregnancy Center Map, a mission led by teachers on the University of Georgia.
My Body, My Data Act
What it will do: The My Body, My Data Act is a federal privateness proposal that targets companies that accumulate reproductive well being data. It would require corporations to get person consent earlier than gathering, retaining or disclosing reproductive well being knowledge except the information is “strictly needed” to offer a service or product the person has requested. It would additionally require corporations to delete customers’ data upon request. The Federal Trade Commission would have the facility to implement the laws.
What gaps it will fill: While HIPAA primarily covers health-care suppliers, this invoice focuses on regulating expertise corporations and apps that accumulate reproductive well being knowledge.
Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., a co-sponsor of the invoice, instructed The Washington Post that because it stands, with out such a legislation, it is doable for “a right-wing nonprofit organization [to] buy all of this data from the various period-tracking apps” and pinpoint each person “who should be pregnant right now but is not.”
How probably is it to cross? Jacobs appeared to concede in her interview with the Post that the invoice is unlikely to change into federal legislation, given the Republican opposition to increasing abortion protections. But, she stated, the federal invoice may encourage and be a mannequin for state-level actions.
Health and Location Data Protection Act
What it will do: This federal invoice, launched by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and different Democrats in June, would ban knowledge brokers from promoting location and health-care knowledge.
The invoice would give the FTC energy to implement the requirements round promoting well being and placement data. It would additionally give state attorneys common and people the facility to sue over alleged violations. The invoice additionally guarantees $1 billion in funding to the FTC over the subsequent decade to hold out its work, together with the enforcement of this legislation.
What gaps it will fill: While the My Body, My Data Act primarily offers with the gathering of well being knowledge, Warren’s invoice focuses on regulating the sale of location knowledge. The proposal got here after Vice reported that knowledge brokers akin to SafeGraph had been promoting location knowledge of people that visited abortion clinics.
How probably is it to cross? The invoice would probably want some Republicans on board to have an opportunity at passing, which is a tall order given the occasion’s common opposition to increasing abortion protections.
State legal guidelines and proposals
Pennsylvania’s Protection of Pregnant Individuals’ Information Act
What it will do: This invoice, launched in May by Democratic state Rep. Mary Jo Daley, would prohibit so-called disaster being pregnant facilities from disclosing nonpublic well being data they’ve collected with out specific authorization.
What gaps it will fill: Recent studies have highlighted the information dangers concerned in visiting a disaster being pregnant heart. Some pregnant individuals searching for abortions do not realize the facilities could not provide abortion providers and as an alternative attempt to dissuade guests from ending their pregnancies.
Federal lawmakers have known as on Google to make it clearer to shoppers that such facilities, which frequently have web sites designed to appear to be these of abortion clinics, don’t provide abortions. Since these facilities are sometimes not licensed medical suppliers and provide free providers, they don’t seem to be certain to federal well being privateness legal guidelines, Time reported, based mostly on conversations with privateness attorneys.
The Pennsylvania invoice may make it more durable for these anti-abortion facilities to reveal data that in any other case falls on this unprotected space.
How efficient wouldn’t it be? The invoice nonetheless permits clinics to reveal nonpublic well being data with out authorization if the clinic is required to adjust to nationwide, state or native legal guidelines, or a courtroom order or investigation. This may doubtlessly undermine the effectiveness of the protections.
Sanctuary state legal guidelines and proposals
What they might do: These kinds of payments, handed or launched in a number of Democratic stronghold states, would make it simpler for pregnant individuals searching for abortions outdoors of their very own states to take action by safeguarding their data inside so-called sanctuary states. That means if an individual in Texas seeks a authorized abortion in Connecticut, for instance, it could possibly be more durable for Texas authorities to acquire data on that process.
The laws differs barely from state to state. Generally, most of these payments search to stop sure companies or suppliers of their states from having handy over delicate reproductive well being data to a different state searching for to prosecute an alleged abortion beneath its personal legal guidelines.
Which states have them: Two such proposals which have already been signed into legislation by Democratic governors are Connecticut’s Reproductive Freedom Defense Act and New Jersey’s Assembly Bill 3975 / Senate Bill 2633.
Similar payments have been launched in California, Massachusetts and New York.
What gaps they might fill: As of July 7, 9 states have already outlawed abortion, and 4 states could quickly cross legal guidelines to ban abortion, in keeping with Politico. Many individuals in these states could select to obtain abortion providers in protected harbor states akin to Connecticut whereas nonetheless going through authorized dangers of their residence states.
That means any such laws may protect vacationers from states which have outlawed abortion from legal responsibility for receiving such providers in a state that has authorized abortion providers and safeguard legal guidelines.
How efficient they might be? While these legal guidelines will defend data on authorized procedures that occur within the states the place they exist, sufferers who stay in states with restrictive abortion legal guidelines will nonetheless need to be conscious of the place else their medical data could also be held.
“Imagine that you are in Alabama, and you come to Connecticut and get an abortion, and then you go see any other doctor in Alabama. We’re increasingly in a world where your medical record may just kind of follow you back to Alabama,” Carly Zubrzycki, a well being legislation professor on the University of Connecticut School of Law, instructed the Verge.
Also, among the measures embrace sure exceptions that might enable data to be handed over. For instance, New Jersey’s legislation permits exceptions beneath legitimate courtroom orders or in circumstances the place youngster or elder abuse is suspected in good religion. But within the latter case, it says reproductive health-care providers which are authorized in New Jersey shouldn’t be thought-about abuse.
WATCH: Bipartisan lawmakers debate new framework for privateness laws