Taxing the rich is an enormous matter in Washington lately.

President Joe Biden lately proposed in his 2023 annual price range a so-called billionaire minimal revenue tax that might enhance levies on the nation’s wealthiest households.

Under the plan, individuals with a internet price of $100 million or extra would face a 20% tax on their full revenue, together with unrealized appreciation.

But one different proposal kicking round Capitol Hill — to lift taxes on excessive earners making $400,000 and up a 12 months — went unmentioned in Biden’s price range, and it may assist resolve Social Security’s funding woes.

Social Security is funded by payroll taxes, which in 2022 apply to wages as much as $147,000. Both the employer and worker contribute 6.2% of wages as much as that revenue threshold, which is adjusted yearly.

A latest Congressional proposal seeks to use that payroll tax on wages of $400,000 and up, amongst different adjustments, to shore up this system.

The clock is ticking for lawmakers to make adjustments to make sure this system can proceed to pay advantages as promised. The Social Security Board of Trustees estimates the funds might be depleted in 2034, at which level 78% of advantages will likely be payable.

To shore up the system, leaders face a selection of reducing advantages by adjustments like elevating the retirement age, growing taxes or doing a mixture of each.

Applying Social Security payroll taxes to these above the wage base is a well-liked thought with the general public, and even has its personal marketing campaign slogan, “Scrap the Cap,” stated Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works.

Once a employee crosses the brink of paying Social Security taxes on the primary $147,000 of their annual earnings, their paychecks are not topic to these levies.

As a end result, employees who’re above the earnings threshold might pay Social Security payroll taxes for a part of the 12 months solely.

“A lot of people don’t even know there is a maximum, and when they find out, they think the law should be changed so that everybody pays in all year,” Altman stated.

A Medicare tax of 1.45% additionally applies to wages. Combined with Social Security, this represents a 7.65% tax paid each by workers and employers and is named FICA, which stands for the Federal Insurance Contributions Act.

Notably, there isn’t any wage restrict for the Medicare tax, after Congress did away with it beginning in 1994.

Today, lawmakers may select to make the identical change to Social Security. They may additionally select to extend the tax charge from 6.2%.

Democrats have proposed reapplying the Social Security payroll tax beginning at $400,000 in wages. Earnings as much as $147,000 would nonetheless be taxed. Then there can be a donut gap or hole the place the taxes have been not utilized till wages reached $400,000 and the tax was assessed once more.

There are different methods lawmakers may embrace extra wages within the Social Security payroll tax, in line with Kathleen Romig, director of Social Security and incapacity coverage on the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

That may embrace merely making use of the tax on all wages above $147,000.

Additionally, they may create a surtax particularly for greater earners, and probably lowering the advantages they obtain.

Lawmakers may additionally select to use Social Security payroll taxes to applications that have been non-existent when Congress final addressed this difficulty, similar to transit subsidies or versatile spending accounts.

Since the cap was first set, wages on the high have grown dramatically sooner.

Social Security payroll taxes initially coated about 90% of wages. To cowl that degree of wages, the cap can be should be round $270,000, in line with a 2016 estimate.

“Just keeping up with the growing wage inequality in this country, not to mention the other forms of inequality, would close a substantial portion of the financing gap,” Romig stated.

The longer Congress waits to behave, the much less seemingly it makes elevating the taxable wage base by itself sufficient to unravel Social Security’s total funding points.

Eliminating the cap was as soon as sufficient to take away the deficit, in line with Joe Elsasser, founder and president of Covisum, a Social Security claiming software program firm.

Now, even when all wages are taxed, it solely covers 60% to 70% of the shortfall, he stated.

“Each year we delay reforms, the cost to have tax revenue on current workers meet the need indefinitely goes up,” Elsasser stated.

Raising the taxes employees should pay raises questions on intergenerational fairness, he stated.

“Is it fair to make the next generation support their parents, which is effectively what happens when you’re increasing payroll tax to fund benefits for current retirees?” Elsasser stated.

If the payroll tax charge is moved greater than 6.2%, that may imply much less take-home pay for employees.

“From an individual planning perspective, the challenge is not to let it crowd out your own retirement savings,” Elsasser stated.