Commercial real-estate companies large Cushman & Wakefield on Wednesday appealed a choose’s order that it adjust to subpoenas issued by the New York lawyer common’s workplace in search of paperwork associated to its value determinations of properties owned by former President Donald Trump’s firm.

Cushman & Wakefield argued that complying with the subpoena for tens of 1000’s of pages of paperwork would compromise the confidential data of almost 1,000 of its shoppers who don’t have any connection to the Trump Organization, or the properties being eyed by Attorney General Letitia James in her civil investigation of Trump.

Cushman additionally submitted in a court docket submitting an affidavit from an impartial valuation guide who wrote that the paperwork sought by James’ workplace “will not provide a reliable basis to evaluate or critique appraisals” of Trump properties which can be already within the AG’s possession.

“While we are filing this appeal out of an obligation to protect the privacy of our clients and preserve the integrity our client relationships, we wish to continue working with the Office of the Attorney General and hope for a swift and successful conclusion to the investigation,” the corporate stated in an announcement.

And the corporate stated, “Cushman’s appraisers did nothing wrong, and Cushman stands behind its appraisers and their appraisals.”

James is investigating the Trump Organization over claims that the corporate illegally manipulated the acknowledged valuations of actual property property to acquire extra favorable monetary phrases in loans, insurance coverage insurance policies and taxes associated to these properties.

Last month, the AG’s workplace stated Cushman had refused to adjust to subpoenas for data associated to its value determinations of three Trump-owned properties — the Seven Springs Estate, Trump National Golf Club, Los Angeles, and 40 Wall Street — “and information about Cushman’s larger business relationship with the Trump Organization.”

James’s workplace stated that proof exhibits the Trump Organization submitted “fraudulent or misleading information valuations of conservation easements to the Internal Revenue Service” associated to the primary two of these properties.

And the workplace stated that Cushman had issued three value determinations to Capital One Bank associated to 40 Wall Street in Manhattan that valued that property at between $200 million and $220 million from 2010 via 2012, earlier than issuing an appraisal to Ladder Capital Finance LLC in 2015 that valued the identical constructing at $550 million.

That final appraisal was utilized by the Trump Organization to safe a mortgage from Ladder Capital, which employs the son of Allen Weisselberg, the chief monetary officer of the Trump firm.

On April 25, Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Cushman to adjust to James’ subpoenas and gave them till late May to show over the paperwork.

The order got here hours after Engoron held Trump personally in contempt of court docket for failing to adjust to one other subpoena from James for enterprise paperwork she believed to be in his possession.

Engoron on Wednesday lifted that contempt discovering on the situation that Trump pay James a $110,000 wonderful, and supply further details about the searches for the paperwork that Trump claims he doesn’t have.

Cushman earlier Wednesday requested Engoron to rethink his choice upholding the subpoenas directed on the firm. Engoron shortly denied that request, calling it “without merit,” and “simply a rehash of issues properly decided by this court in prior opinion.”

Cushman stated in court docket filings associated to its attraction Wednesday that final September its legal professionals met just about with officers from James’ workplace to supply value determinations ready by the corporate for the Trump Organization on Seven Springs, Trump National Golf Club-Los Angeles and 40 Wall Street. In January, Cushman agreed “to confer” with James’ workplace “to address issues raised by [the attorney general’s team] during the September” assembly.

Cushman additionally stated that the lawyer common’s workplace confirmed in writing that Cushman’s presentation of the Trump-related supplies “constituted confidential settlement discussions.”

The firm stated that James’ workplace “breached its promises to Cushman,” when it requested Engoron to uphold the subpoenas issued to Cushman for different paperwork, by together with data obtained from Cushman within the January assembly.

“Cushman was promised and expected” that materials to be handled confidentially, the corporate stated in an announcement.

A spokesperson for James stated, in an announcement to CNBC: “The court has clearly ruled that Cushman & Wakefield must comply with our subpoenas and turn over information that is relevant to our investigation into Donald Trump and the Trump Organization, and has summarily rejected their attempt today to seek reconsideration of these rulings.”

“While they have a right to appeal, we have a right to continue this investigation and to seek answers,” the spokesperson stated.