Amber Heard’s legal professionals have made one other name for a re-trial of her defamation case with Johnny Depp.
In paperwork filed on Friday, the actress’s authorized crew stated that one of many individuals initially summoned to function a juror within the trial had not appeared and had been changed by another person.
The paperwork, reported by the PA information company, stated: “Juror No 15 was not the individual summoned for jury duty on 11 April, 2022, and therefore was not part of the jury panel and could not have properly served on the jury at this trial.
“As the courtroom little doubt agrees, it’s deeply troubling for a person not summoned for jury responsibility nonetheless to look for jury responsibility and serve on a jury, particularly in a case similar to this.
“This was a high-profile case, where the fact and date of the jury trial were highly publicised prior to and after the issuance of the juror summonses.”
Lawyers added that Ms Heard had the precise “to rely on basic protection… that the jurors in this trial would be individuals who were actually summoned for jury duty”.
“Ms Heard’s due process was therefore compromised,” the paperwork said.
“Under these circumstances, a mistrial should be declared, and a new trial ordered.”
Depp v Heard: The key items of proof from six weeks of ‘cleaning soap opera’ trial
The information comes simply days after Heard’s legal professionals made one other name for a re-trial, claiming the unique judgment had not been supported by proof.
Depp sued Heard, his former companion, over a 2018 article she wrote for the Washington Post about her experiences as a survivor of home abuse, which his legal professionals stated falsely accused him of being an abuser.
Depp denied abusing Heard and informed jurors that his ex-wife’s allegations of home violence had been “heinous and disturbing”.
Heard insisted her article was not about her ex-husband, however in regards to the “bigger cultural conversation” surrounding the #MeToo motion on the time.
After six weeks of testimony, the courtroom case got here to an finish on 1 June, with the jury discovering that the article was defamatory in direction of Depp, who was awarded $10.35m (£8.2m) in damages.
Depp v Heard: How has on-line abuse of Amber Heard turn out to be acceptable?
Heard did win on one depend of her counter-suit, efficiently arguing that certainly one of Depp’s attorneys defamed her by claiming her allegations had been “an abuse hoax” aimed toward capitalising on the #MeToo motion.
The jury awarded her $2m (£1.5m) in damages.